This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: New Sanyo Stormy16 relocations
- From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, cgen at sources dot redhat dot com,sid at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 18 Dec 2002 10:47:28 -0500
- Subject: Re: New Sanyo Stormy16 relocations
- References: <1039041358.28757.307.camel@p4><20021204225643.GS27956@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au><1039043233.28767.313.camel@p4><200212170353.gBH3r9f14238@envy.delorie.com><15871.31192.305439.813418@casey.transmeta.com><200212171947.gBHJl3P23665@envy.delorie.com><3E004FDF.3060304@redhat.com>
cagney wrote:
> [...]
> > Cgen folks (and others)... would it be acceptable to change the cgen
> > approval rules to allow people who could otherwise approve
> > port-specific patches in binutils, gdb, or sid, to be allowed to
> > approve port-specific changes in cgen as well?
>
> This would only all make sense if the .opc et.al. files were all (C)
> FSF. [...]
Sorry, I don't see how that relates to the issue. Regardless of whose
(C) is on the files, the current matter is which of several potential
maintainer types should feel free to commit changes.
- FChE