This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: adding namespace support to GDB


On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 02:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:41:06AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> > > In article <3D6677D3.6E84743C@caldera.com>, Petr Sorfa
> > > <petrs@caldera.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Well to help things along I will be submitting a DWARF patch that
> > > > will supported imported declarations which are essential for FORTRAN
> > > > modules and C++ namespaces.
> > > 
> > > Great, I look forward to reading it.
> > > 
> > > > This is essential for the "using" commands in either language (of
> > > > course the compiler needs to generate the correct DWARF
> > > > ;o)).
> > > 
> > > Yes, well, there is always that.  Certainly it seems like a solution
> > > for C++ will initially have to get recreate namespace info from
> > > DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name, and there's no way that we'll be able to
> > > allow users to use symbol names as if all the appropriate using
> > > directives were in effect, since that information simply isn't in the
> > > debug information that GCC is currently producing.  (Though that's not
> > > the end of the world: we should be able to do name lookup using C++'s
> > > name resolution rules based on the enclosing function and its
> > > arguments, presumably.)
> > 
> > C++ certainly does _not_ need to reconstruct from
> > DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name.  Everything we need should be there in
> > DW_TAG_namespace and DW_TAG_structure/class markers; I have patches to
> > use this information, with the caveats I noted in my other message.
> 
> If you hunt through the gcc patch archives, you'll find my patches to 
> produce DW_AT_namespace, approved twice by Jason Merrill.
> 
> Should still apply cleanly.

Huh.  I could have sworn what we need was already there; am I on crack? 
It sure looks like it from reading this debug output; I'm going to have
to find my notes... hope I still have them.

(And is DW_AT_namespace a dwarf3 thing?  I don't see it in my v2 spec.)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]