This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: 5.0 known issues 2000-02-16
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: 5.0 known issues 2000-02-16
- From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:09:49 +0100
- CC: gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <38AA42EA.5106E153@cygnus.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:25:46 +1100
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Target Specific:
GNU/Linux/i386:
After gdb_proc_service.h patch, its results are:
# of expected passes 6363
# of unexpected failures 12
# of expected failures 200
but it didn't run the threads tests. I believe the solib.c problem is
still dangling. Actually, a testcase for what ever it is is needed
first.
Looks like I misinterpreted the test logs. The results above do
include running the thread tests. The relevant test script tries to
link with -lpthreads first, which fails on most systems, but then
tries -lpthread, which succeeds.
I am working on the solib.c problem. HJ reported that there is indeed
only a problem with dlclose(): GDB doesn't remove the shared library
from its list of loaded objects. As a consequence a subsequent
dlopen() isn't noticed by GDB. Basically my approach is based on a
patch from FreeBSD, but I'm changing things to minimize the amount of
data read from the target. I'll need a few more days, and this patch
really needs to be tested on some more platforms (at least SunOS 4)
before it can be integrated.
I have a test case. I'll try to integrate it in the test-suite.
Solaris: No feed back, I'll put it on my list of things to do.
I have successfully built GDB on Solaris 2.6, see:
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-testers/2000-q1/msg00030.html
Mark