This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: none



> For register views, yes, we can do anything we please.  However, when
> the compiler places a register in an MMX register value, we still get
> an old-fashioned symbol with a LOC_REGISTER.  Register views don't
> come into it.  As long as we only have a LOC_REGISTER, we don't have
> enough information to do the job right.

I probably don't understand how this works.  How is the LOC_REGISTER
thing different from the case where the user specifies a certain
register (e.g., when the user wants to change its value)?  At any
given point in a debugging session, GDB knows what is the current TOS,
and therefore can map any MMX register to the corresponding ST(i),
right?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]