This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project. See the GDB home page for more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Could CVS run indent on the server before the file is checked in. I think cvs-wrappers can do this kind of stuff. I'm not sure what other implications there are. Brendan Simon. Stan Shebs wrote: > REFORMAT: Over the years GDB sources have accumulated detritus from > many different coding styles, despite the official GNU standard's > encouragement of uniformity, and now there is much confusion about the > correct style for GDB. So I propose a flag day, in which we run GNU > indent over all the code at once. The CVS diffs will be massive, old > patches will fail (although one could run indent on the patches), but > then we can use indent all the time and never have to deal with this > again. > > ANSI/ISO C: So far I've not seen any reports of people being hosed by > the pure standard C code in 4.18. By the end of June we'll know for > sure; then we can whack all the K&R compat bits and go to new-style > code everywhere. > > Stan