This is the mail archive of the
gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Fwd: GDB 5.2.92 available]
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com, gdb-testers at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 11 Dec 2002 10:01:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: GDB 5.2.92 available]
- References: <200212111753.gBBHrf904528@duracef.shout.net>
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:53:41 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net> said:
> gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: get value of $fp (0xNNNNNNNN)
> Noise, stack address in test name noise. The test passes with
> different names in different configurations.
Yeah, I've been complaining about this one too; see discussion on
gdb-patches with subject containing "Don't display values in output of
pc-fp.exp". On the one hand, we're apparently not supposed to care
too much about stuff in parentheses; on the other hand, I don't see
what good it does to include those numbers in the output.
> gdb.threads/killed.exp: GDB exits after multi-threaded program exits messily
> This test PASSed with 5.2.91 and FAILed with 5.3 in these configurations:
> gcc=2.95.3 binutils=vendor gformat=dwarf-2,
> gcc=3.2.1 binutils=vendor gformat=dwarf-2
> gcc=vendor binutils=vendor gformat=dwarf-2
> This test FAILed with 5.2.91 and PASSed with 5.3 in these configurations:
> gcc=vendor binutils=vendor gformat=stabs+
> I don't have analysis for this.
This test is somewhat unstable for me on mainline even without
changing compilers. (3.1/dwarf-2 is my most common compiler format.)
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu