This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-03-24


Here are my Sunday Project results for 2001-03-24.

  Red Hat Linux 6.2 native:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     4
    # of WARNINGs                   2
    # of expected passes            6573
    # of unexpected failures        111
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          156
    # of unresolved testcases       2
    # of untested testcases         19

  Red Hat Linux 7.0 native:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     4
    # of WARNINGs                   2
    # of expected passes            6623
    # of unexpected failures        106
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          155
    # of unresolved testcases       2
    # of untested testcases         18

  Solaris 2.5.1 native:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     4
    # of WARNINGs                   2
    # of expected passes            6614
    # of unexpected failures        97
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          155
    # of unresolved testcases       34
    # of untested testcases         19

I ran the tests with fsf gcc cvs gcc-3_0-branch 2001-03-24 and FSF gdb
cvs 2001-03-24.  I counted the ERROR and WARNING lines by hand inspection
of the summary files.

All results are in Terf, http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gdb.cgi .
Note that Terf still has problems with duplicate test names.

The merged results for all platforms contain 4 ERRORs, 2 WARNINGs,
and 120 FAILs.

Here are the merged ERRORs categorized by test script:

      4 TOTAL
      = =====
      4 gdb.c++/userdef.exp

Here are the merged WARNINGs categorized by test script:

      2 TOTAL
      = =====
      2 gdb.c++/userdef.exp

Here are the merged FAILs categorized by test script:

    120 TOTAL
    === =====
     30 gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp
     18 gdb.c++/classes.exp
     11 gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
      8 gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp
      7 gdb.c++/templates.exp
      6 gdb.c++/overload.exp
      6 gdb.c++/inherit.exp
      5 gdb.c++/namespace.exp
      4 gdb.c++/method.exp
      4 gdb.c++/derivation.exp
      3 gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
      3 gdb.c++/local.exp
      2 gdb.c++/annota2.exp
      2 gdb.base/structs2.exp
      2 gdb.base/selftest.exp
      2 gdb.base/return2.exp
      2 gdb.base/ending-run.exp
      1 gdb.trace/packetlen.exp
      1 gdb.stabs/weird.exp
      1 gdb.java/jmisc.exp
      1 gdb.c++/demangle.exp
      1 gdb.base/exprs.exp

Changes from 2001-03-17:

  2001-03-17 total           0 ERRORs
  gdb.c++/userdef.exp       +4 ERRORs   needs investigation
  2001-03-24 total           4 ERRORs

  2001-03-17 total           0 WARNINGs
  gdb.c++/userdef.exp       +2 WARNINGs needs investigation
  2001-03-24 total           2 WARNINGs

  2001-03-17 total         122 FAILs
  gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp      -1 FAILs    probably a harness glitch
  gdb.c++/userdef.exp       -1 FAILs    test script has ERRORs instead
  2001-03-24 total         120 FAILs

The first test in virtfunc.exp changed its result from FAIL to UNRESOLVED.
virtfunc.cc has not changed; virtfunc.exp has not changed; and the output
in gdb.log has not changed.  This looks some kind of test harness problem
(virtfunc.exp comes right after userdef.exp, which is giving ERRORs
and WARNINGs).  I'm not going to investigate this.

The test program gdb.c++/userdef.cc failed to compile this week.
I don't know yet whether this is a problem in g++ or a problem in the
test program.  (g++ has been tightening up on illegal C++ constructs).

Next, I am looking into userdef.cc.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]