This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix stepping bug associated with non-contiguous blocks
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Kevin> After spending a few minutes looking at things, I now have an
Kevin> VAX is, historically, a very important target. For a long time (and
Kevin> perhaps even now), it was considered to be the canonical example of a
Kevin> CISC architecture.
Kevin> Support still exists in GCC, though it's not clear to me if it
Kevin> actually works. I saw recent patches (from April, 2019) from someone
Kevin> who is trying to get VAX support in GCC to work again.
Kevin> Given that GCC still has code which provides VAX architecture
Kevin> support, I think that GDB should do likewise. I think that we
Kevin> should attempt to not break it (anymore than it's already broken?),
Kevin> but I also don't think we should attempt to test it beyond making
Kevin> sure that it still builds.
This all sounds reasonable to me. Having a hook like this stay around
isn't so very expensive. Thanks for looking into this.