This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "info break" + "catch catch" + -static-{libstdc++,libgcc}

From: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:09:39 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "info break" + "catch catch" + -static-{libstdc++,libgcc}
References: <20190705160055.13355-1-palves@redhat.com> <20190705160055.13355-2-palves@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> Irrespective of whether it's a good idea to use
Pedro> -static-libgcc/-static-libstdc++, GDB should not crash.  Since there
Pedro> are two copies of the code, it seems right to have more than one
Pedro> location.  So the fix is just to remove the assertion.

Thanks for doing this.

It turns out that this was reported multiple times in bugzilla.  I dup'd
them down to just PR c++/15468.

The patch looks good to me.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "info break" + "catch catch" + -static-{libstdc++,libgcc}
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix "info break" crash + make "catch catch" show as catchpoint
  - From: Pedro Alves
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix "info break" + "catch catch" + -static-{libstdc++,libgcc}
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]