This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Introduce field_unsigned
>> If subclasses don't need to know that the field was originally an integer or a float,
>> all of ui_out can be reduced to outputting strings and sub-classes need only provide
>> that one member function for all field types.
>> I don't have any preference one way or another, I was mainly commenting on the
>> apparent discrepancy how similar field types are handled.
I suppose if we ever want to, say, switch MI to use JSON, then
preserving the difference would make sense. I'll change it.