This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] Create xml from target descriptions




> On 25 Jan 2018, at 13:14, Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> i don't really like print_xml_feature::visit_pre being declared in arch/tdesc.h
> with different implementations in target-descriptions.c and gdbserver/tdesc.c
> while all other visit_* implementations are in arch/tdesc.c.  I would prefere
> visit_pre being implemented in arch/tdesc.c, too.  Even when it means to add
> some #ifdef GDBSERVER ... #else ... #endif blocks until there is a common tdesc.

Thanks for the review!

A common print_xml_feature would require 4 ifdefs, which would be too messy.
I’ll take a look see if I can communise the tdesc_architecture and tdesc_osabi
interfaces - it should be fairly simple to do.
Once done, I should be able to add a common print_xml_feature without any
ifdefs. Hopefully.


> On 25 Jan 2018, at 15:44, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> Same for tdesc_type::make_gdb_type (patch #5).  But here i would prefer to not
>> even declare the method for GDBserver, i.e.
>> 
>> struct tdesc_type
>> {
>> 
>>  [...]
>> 
>> #ifndef GDBSERVER
>>  virtual type *make_gdb_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) const = 0;
>> #endif
>> };
>> 
>> The problem i see with implementing stubs calling error is that you cannot find
>> out you made a mistake until you call the function during run-time.  This gives
>> room to nasty bugs which could easily be prevented when there is a compile bug.
> 
> 
> make_gdb_type and gdbarch shouldn't be put into arch/tdesc.h at all, if
> possible.  You can create an sub-class of tdesc_element_visitor in gdb
> side, and create the gdb type by visiting these elements, like this,
> 
> class gdb_type_creator : public tdesc_element_visitor
….

Nice idea. I can add an extra patch into the series to do this.




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]