This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v5] gdb: ADI support




On 7/27/2017 8:49 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
Weimin Pan <weimin.pan@oracle.com> writes:

+
+/* ADI stat settings.  */
+typedef struct
+{
+  /* The ADI block size.  */
+  unsigned long blksize;
+
+  /* Number of bits used for an ADI version tag which can be
+   * used together with the shift value for an ADI version tag
+   * to encode or extract the ADI version value in a pointer.  */
+  unsigned long nbits;
+
+  /* The maximum ADI version tag value supported.  */
+  int max_version;
+
+  /* ADI version tag file.  */
+  int tag_fd;
+
+  /* ADI availability check has been done.  */
+  bool checked_avail;
+
+  /* ADI is available.  */
+  bool is_avail;
+
+} adi_stat_t;
+
+/* Per-process ADI stat info.  */
+
+typedef struct
+{
+  /* The process identifier.  */
+  pid_t pid;
+
+  /* The ADI stat.  */
+  adi_stat_t stat;
+} sparc64_adi_info;
+
+static std::forward_list<sparc64_adi_info *> a_proc_list;
a_proc_list is not a good variable name.  How about adi_proc_list?

It was originally named "adi_proc_list". I shortened it so I don't run into those "long source lines" :)
Will change it back.

Can you use "std::forward_list<sparc64_adi_info>" instead?  I am reading
book "C++ Coding Standards: 101 Rules, Guidelines, and Best Practices",
and know rule 79 is "Store only values and smart pointers in
containers".  I know we have "std::forward_list<regcache *>", and I am
trying to fix it.

Will take a look.

+
+/* Find ADI info for process PID.  */
+
+static sparc64_adi_info *
+find_adi_info (pid_t pid)
+{
+  sparc64_adi_info *proc;
+
+  for ( auto it = a_proc_list.begin(); it != a_proc_list.end(); ++it
)
for (const auto &info : a_proc_list)

+    if ((*it)->pid == pid)
+      return (*it);
+
+  return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Add ADI info for process PID.  Returns newly allocated info
+   object.  */
+
+static sparc64_adi_info *
+add_adi_info (pid_t pid)
+{
+  sparc64_adi_info *proc = XCNEW (sparc64_adi_info);
+
+  proc->pid = pid;
+  proc->stat.is_avail = false;
+  proc->stat.checked_avail = false;
+  proc->stat.tag_fd = 0;
+  a_proc_list.push_front (proc);
+
+  return proc;
+}
+
+/* Get ADI info for process PID, creating one if it doesn't exist.  */
+
+static sparc64_adi_info *
+get_adi_info_proc (pid_t pid)
+{
+  sparc64_adi_info *proc;
+
+  proc = find_adi_info (pid);
+  if (proc == NULL)
+    proc = add_adi_info (pid);
+
+  return proc;
+}
+
+static adi_stat_t
+get_adi_info (pid_t pid)
+{
+  sparc64_adi_info *proc;
+
+  proc = get_adi_info_proc (pid);
+  return proc->stat;
+}
+
+/* Is called when GDB is no longer debugging process PID.  It
+   deletes data structure that keeps track of the ADI stat.  */
+
+void
+sparc64_forget_process (pid_t pid)
+{
+  sparc64_adi_info *proc;
+  int target_errno;
+
+  proc = find_adi_info (pid);
+  if (proc != NULL)
+    {
+      if (proc->stat.tag_fd > 0)
+        target_fileio_close (proc->stat.tag_fd, &target_errno);
+      a_proc_list.remove (proc);
+      xfree (proc);
+    }
+
+}
+
+
+int main ()
+{
+  char *haddr;
+  caddr_t vaddr;
+  int	version;
+
+  // test ISM
We have mixed comment styles, // and "/**/".  Since it is a c code, we
can use /**/?

+  int shmid = shmget (IPC_PRIVATE, SHMSIZE, IPC_CREAT | 0666);
+  if (shmid == -1)
+    exit(1);
+  char *shmaddr = (char *)shmat (shmid, NULL, 0x666 | SHM_RND);
+  if (shmaddr == (char *)-1)
+    {
+      shmctl (shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
+      exit(1);
+    }
+  // enable ADI on ISM segment
It is a sentence, so Capitalize 'E', and put "." at the end.

/* Enable ADI on ISM segment.  */


OK, will update the test with your comments.

Thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]