This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 4/4] Don't throw an error in 'info registers' for unavailable MIPS GP registers.
- From: John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD dot org>
- To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at imgtec dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Luis Machado <lgustavo at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:17:03 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Don't throw an error in 'info registers' for unavailable MIPS GP registers.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170412183727.22483-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1732755.e2u3aPx1km@ralph.baldwin.cx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1705052107190.2590@tp.orcam.me.uk> <17900147.CpTq3xXkZM@ralph.baldwin.cx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1706160040390.23046@tp.orcam.me.uk>
On 6/15/17 7:50 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>>>> However, as you note, the primary goal is removing the error(), and I can
>>>>> live with any format that is readable.
>>>>
>>>> Any other thoughts on "<absent>" vs "<unavl>" vs always using the 64-bit
>>>> table layout vs <insert other option here>?
>>>
>>> I've been busy with binutils stuff recently, sorry. I'll try to have a
>>> look again next week.
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Given the lack of consensus otherwise I think ` <unavl>' is the only way
> to go. I hope there is consensus about this variant being better than
> `<unavail'.
Yes, I think this is better certainly.
> Thank you for patience and apologies for the long RTT.
No problem. I'm on vacation-ish so it might be a while before I test and
post the updated patch.
--
John Baldwin