This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch, testsuite] check for UTF-32 target wide charset support in gdb.base/wchar.exp
- From: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 21:40:16 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] check for UTF-32 target wide charset support in gdb.base/wchar.exp
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55FA325D dot 1020207 at codesourcery dot com> <8361397hwd dot fsf at gnu dot org>
Eli Zaretskii <email@example.com> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:24:13 -0600
>> From: Sandra Loosemore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> If GDB is configured without ICONV support, the target wide charset
>> defaults to "ISO-8859-1" (which isn't even a wide charset), and all the
>> wide strings in this test print as gibberish. Otherwise, GDB seems to
>> think the default is "auto; currently UTF-32", so let's make the
>> dependency on UTF-32 explicit here and bail out if it's not available.
> Why UTF-32, hard-coded? Why not allow also UTF-16, for example?
Because this is the case of no iconv support and thus gdb is supplying its own
minimal version. No point in supporting anything unwarranted.
If a compelling case arises for UTF-16 we can cross that bridge
when we get to it.