This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove CHECK_TYPEDEF, use check_typedef instead


On 07/11/2015 02:18 PM, Doug Evans wrote:

> I'm not advocating for a really_long_function_name_that_mentions_all_actions,
> just pointing out that the current situation is lacking.
> Something like "resolve_type" might work for me,
> but I haven't put too much time into it.

Agreed with all points.

If we set aside renaming (as it seems like an orthogonal issue, and I'm
guilty for bringing it up), you in favor or against removing
CHECK_TYPEDEF, as in Simon's patch?

Myself, I've been acquainted with the CHECK_TYPEDEF macro for so long, that
it no longer confuses me, but Simon quickly convinced me that as is, two ways
of doing the exact same isn't much useful and confuses newcomers.  So I'm
leaning on taking his patch.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]