This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] While processing a struct die, store the method's address in its fn_field
- From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:46:36 -0800
- Subject: Re: [RFC] While processing a struct die, store the method's address in its fn_field
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGyQ6gxO+u9hc_6Qo8Z=-MsNgrBPruDSULYOQY-iQ+xv9d0xfw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22T800NSiXg4XjOwTgwQSZfs-uSBoSku0b7tkF=CAGkzwQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22Tqr7_6c0C2y+cCicmMba=-8nFnVX18+BXowvTsLHEdwQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22TXYTd6n3GY_=wpdTcZOwMqBFPD+Qp2ic0UJ1aw305bhA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> While going through this is occurs to me: Do we *need* an assembler
> testcase here?
> If we're just testing lambda hand-callability, it would be preferable
> to just have a .cc test.
I preferred an assembler testcase because the problem the patch is
trying to solve does not occur if Clang is the compiler.