This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sunday, October 12 2014, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > I dislike the proposal of adding prefixes/suffixes to the group names > because I feel it might be harder to type, and also because it feels a > little unusual, if we consider the common way of providing arguments to > commands. > > Using -g to specify syscall groups, as Sergio said, has also the > advantage of providing us with an intuitive command to list available > syscall groups, by saying "catch syscall -g" with no arguments. > > So, my vote goes to using '-g' for each syscall group we want to > catch. Is that ok for you, guys? Yeah, this is still OK to me :-). > I will still wait a few days to see if anyone has more suggestions > before sending the updated patch that fixes the syntax and the other > things you guys pointed out. Good idea. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/
Attachment:
pgptu4YR6UACy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |