Re: eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left.

["Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>]

Joel Brobecker wrote:

> So let's discuss the new obsoleting procedure, so we can document it:
> 
>  . I think that the first 4 steps (post email on gdb@, wait a week,
>    then on gdb-announce, wait another week) are fine. Anyone thinks
>    we should go straight to gdb-announce?
> 
>    My thinking is that people interested in maintaining a port
>    with enough skills to do so are likely to already be on gdb@,
>    so we can avoid sending an extra mail to gdb-announce. But
>    the traffic on gdb-announce being very low, and the frequency
>    at which we deprecate targets being fairly small as well,
>    I wouldn't object to a simpler procedure where we email
>    gdb-announce directly.
> 
>  . Remove steps 5 & 6 that mark the code as obsolete, only keeping
>    the last test, which removes the code. I'd add a note to add
>    a NEWS entry.

Sounds all good to me.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com