This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] Implement support for recording extension register ld/st insn
- From: Omair Javaid <omair dot javaid at linaro dot org>
- To: Will Newton <will dot newton at linaro dot org>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Patch Tracking <patches at linaro dot org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:21:12 +0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] Implement support for recording extension register ld/st insn
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1407935535-27978-1-git-send-email-omair dot javaid at linaro dot org> <1407935535-27978-5-git-send-email-omair dot javaid at linaro dot org> <CANu=DmipyTp=mBvWkYJ22qMboYfsj7x3LmWZZZWYGyFdnKYqDw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 13 August 2014 19:10, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 August 2014 14:12, Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org> wrote:
>> gdb:
>>
>> 2014-08-13 Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>>
>> * arm-tdep.c (arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc): Updated.
>> (arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn): Added record handler for ex-register
>> load/store instructions.
>>
>> ---
>> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> index d003619..315b5b0 100644
>> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> @@ -11990,6 +11990,169 @@ arm_record_unsupported_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Record handler for extension register load/store instructions. */
>> +
>> +static int
>> +arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t opcode, single_reg;
>> + uint8_t op_vldm_vstm;
>> + uint32_t record_buf[8], record_buf_mem[128];
>> + ULONGEST u_regval = 0;
>> +
>> + struct regcache *reg_cache = arm_insn_r->regcache;
>> + const int num_regs = gdbarch_num_regs (arm_insn_r->gdbarch);
>> +
>> + opcode = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20, 24);
>> + single_reg = bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 8);
>> + op_vldm_vstm = opcode & 0x1b;
>> +
>> + /* Handle VMOV instructions. */
>> + if ((opcode & 0x1e) == 0x04)
>> + {
>> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 4))
>> + {
>> + record_buf[0] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
>> + record_buf[1] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + uint8_t reg_m = (bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 3) << 1)
>> + | bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 5);
>> +
>> + if (!single_reg)
>> + {
>> + record_buf[0] = num_regs + reg_m;
>> + record_buf[1] = num_regs + reg_m + 1;
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + record_buf[0] = reg_m + ARM_D0_REGNUM;
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + /* Handle VSTM and VPUSH instructions. */
>> + else if (op_vldm_vstm == 0x08 || op_vldm_vstm == 0x0a
>> + || op_vldm_vstm == 0x12)
>> + {
>> + uint32_t start_address, reg_rn, imm_off32, imm_off8, memory_count;
>> + uint32_t memory_index = 0;
>> +
>> + reg_rn = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
>> + regcache_raw_read_unsigned (reg_cache, reg_rn, &u_regval);
>> + imm_off8 = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
>> + imm_off32 = imm_off8 << 24;
>> + memory_count = imm_off8;
>> +
>> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 23))
>> + start_address = u_regval;
>> + else
>> + start_address = u_regval - imm_off32;
>> +
>> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 21))
>> + {
>> + record_buf[0] = reg_rn;
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (memory_count)
>> + {
>> + if (!single_reg)
>> + {
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
>> + start_address = start_address + 4;
>> + memory_index = memory_index + 2;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 2] = start_address + 4;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 3] = 4;
>> + start_address = start_address + 8;
>> + memory_index = memory_index + 4;
>> + }
>> + memory_count--;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + /* Handle VLDM instructions. */
>> + else if (op_vldm_vstm == 0x09 || op_vldm_vstm == 0x0b
>> + || op_vldm_vstm == 0x13)
>> + {
>> + uint32_t reg_count, reg_vd;
>> + uint32_t reg_index = 0;
>> +
>> + reg_vd = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 12, 15);
>> + reg_count = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
>> +
>> + if (single_reg)
>> + reg_vd = reg_vd | (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0) << 4);
>> + else
>> + reg_vd = (reg_vd << 1) | bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0);
>> +
>> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 21))
>> + record_buf[reg_index++] = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
>> +
>> + while (reg_count)
>> + {
>> + if (single_reg)
>> + record_buf[reg_index++] = num_regs + reg_vd + reg_count - 1;
>> + else
>> + record_buf[reg_index++] = ARM_D0_REGNUM + reg_vd + reg_count - 1;
>> +
>> + reg_count--;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + /* VSTR Vector store register. */
>> + else if ((opcode & 0x13) == 0x10)
>> + {
>> + uint32_t start_address, reg_rn, imm_off32, imm_off8, memory_count;
>> + uint32_t memory_index = 0;
>> +
>> + reg_rn = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 16, 19);
>> + regcache_raw_read_unsigned (reg_cache, reg_rn, &u_regval);
>> + imm_off8 = bits (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 0, 7);
>> + imm_off32 = imm_off8 << 24;
>> + memory_count = imm_off8;
>> +
>> + if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 23))
>> + start_address = u_regval + imm_off32;
>> + else
>> + start_address = u_regval - imm_off32;
>> +
>> + if (single_reg)
>> + {
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index] = start_address;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 1] = 4;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 2] = start_address + 4;
>> + record_buf_mem[memory_index + 3] = 4;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + /* VLDR Vector load register. */
>> + else if ((opcode & 0x13) == 0x11)
>> + {
>> + uint8_t single_reg = 0;
>> + uint8_t special_case;
>
> Is there some missing code here? Should there be a TODO comment?
Seems like a bit of code missing here will update it in the final patch.
>
>> +
>> + record_buf[0] = 0;
>> + record_buf[1] = 0;
>> + arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + REG_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_regs, arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count, record_buf);
>> + MEM_ALLOC (arm_insn_r->arm_mems, arm_insn_r->mem_rec_count, record_buf_mem);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Record handler for arm/thumb mode VFP data processing instructions. */
>>
>> static int
>> @@ -12218,11 +12381,11 @@ arm_record_asimd_vfp_coproc (insn_decode_record *arm_insn_r)
>> {
>> /* Handle extension register ld/st instructions. */
>> if (!(op1 & 0x20))
>> - return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + return arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (arm_insn_r);
>>
>> /* 64-bit transfers between arm core and extension registers. */
>> if ((op1 & 0x3e) == 0x04)
>> - return arm_record_unsupported_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> + return arm_record_exreg_ld_st_insn (arm_insn_r);
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Will Newton
> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
Ping! Kindly provide your feedback any further comments will help me
approve this patch series.