This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/4 v1] Add xmethod documentation and NEWS entry
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:57:32 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v1] Add xmethod documentation and NEWS entry
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGyQ6gz2g6UMBNcZprDcMhG-Ts4Fd3jy6Hu3HhQ7jA3CMQTCOA at mail dot gmail dot com> <83ha439l4m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAGyQ6gyw=8WRin3VFZkZdmYWQ=1MBGmdcmJenh595cGnHj7RpQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:43:52 -0700
> From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12 -0700
> >> From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
> >>
> >> The attached patch is almost the same as v19 except that it adds a
> >> small note about the xmethod example mentioning that xmethod in the
> >> example is slightly a different version of C++ operator+.
> >
> > Could you please identify the addition explicitly? I'm not sure which
> > note did you have in mind.
>
> Sorry for not being explicit. The part I am referring to is in the
> node "Writing an Xmethod". It is in the "@noindent" piece right after
> the first C++ example listing.
OK, that's fine. Thanks.