This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Mark H Weaver <mhw at netris dot org>
- Cc: ludo at gnu dot org, guile-devel at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:42:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <wrbvbwejihe dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <wrbr471jxjg dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <834n3x8o7m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <83y519788a dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMQiZurfMyU-qA9LEy_6_BOyRE1-dke93_m505EHuNZrAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <871tz0d5vc dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83iosc76kz dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87wqgr8rsj dot fsf at netris dot org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
> Cc: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> > configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default
> > for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal.
>
> FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In
> the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a
> recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW
Which MinGW? It sounds like nowadays one needs to distinguish between
the various flavors. The exact port of pthreads and gc might also
matter.
> with thread support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it
> seems to work reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems
> and passes much of the test suite.
Good to know; I hope to see a release some place near me in a
not-so-distant future, and will test this at that time.