This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch 1/2] Code cleanup: remote.c *->{async,sync}*
- From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:49:29 +0800
- Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Code cleanup: remote.c *->{async,sync}*
- References: <20130630181059 dot GA29548 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net>
On 07/01/2013 02:10 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
some code/variables are used only in async or sync mode. Rename them
appropriately. The state will be gdb_assert-ed in the next patch.
Do we really need to rename these functions? It is necessary to add
gdb_assert on various sync-only or async-only functions, but I don't
think we can get any benefits from this function renaming.
--
Yao (éå)