This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description.


They have a different header because they're supposed to be embedded
in things that run on the target which are not necessarily
GPL-compatible.  I figured out with the FSF what an appropriate notice
would be for that case.  I'd generally rather we use that notice for
all target XML files, even in the testsuite, to prevent someone
copying the GPL'd version into something by accident - not a big deal,
though.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Walfred> Copyrights:
> Walfred> I took a look on several xml files and all of them had the same
> Walfred> copyright I have used.  Though, would you recommend to use the
> Walfred> common GPL header?
>
> I don't know why the other .xml files have this other header.
> However, seeing as the new file is in the test suite, I think the plain
> GPL comment is preferable.
>
> Tom



-- 
Thanks,
Daniel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]