RE: DPrintf feedback

[Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>]

> > I think it is best to file PRs.  If a patch fixes them all, 
> > then that is
> > fine.  But if not, then this the only way to avoid losing track.
> 
> Will do.

I've opened the following 8 PRs for tracking:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181	
Missing continue on dprintf that defaults to "gdb" style from "agent"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15186 
Agent style dprintf does not buffer output properly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15182 
Pagination is triggered for dprintf
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15187 
Dprintf does not work for Eclipse on Ubuntu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15179 
Dprintf interrupts execution when condition is false
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184 
Cannot change dprintf style to agent for existing dprintfs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15180	
Agent style dprintf does not respect conditions
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15185 
Dprintf should parse its string for validity right away

BR,

Marc