Re: [PATCH] aarch64-tdep basic port.

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 01/25/2013 06:54 PM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 25/01/13 17:58, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> Okay.  Seems odd to me to just be clear the low bits and
>> doing nothing else if they're "reserved", instead of waiting
>> until they do have some meaning (at which point GDB will
>> necessarily need to learn to do something about them).  Does
>> actually end up seeing non-4 bytes instructions today somehow?
> 
> It would be safe to remove this masking code today, if you prefer.

I would.  One place less for us to worry about if we want to
change this interface before you define the bits.

(I'll be looking at the gdbserver/native patches next)

-- 
Pedro Alves