This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
>> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.
Pedro> It's not pointless in gdbserver. The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
Pedro> the WinCE port. See fe7cf52e.
Thanks.
I think I will just drop this patch from the series.
Tom