This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [patch v3 16/16] btrace, x86: restrict to Atom
- From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus dot t dot metzger at intel dot com>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "markus dot t dot metzger at gmail dot com" <markus dot t dot metzger at gmail dot com>, "jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com" <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, "palves at redhat dot com" <palves at redhat dot com>, "tromey at redhat dot com" <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:22:42 +0000
- Subject: RE: [patch v3 16/16] btrace, x86: restrict to Atom
- References: <1344949171-9545-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1344949171-9545-17-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <201208141327.q7EDR7TC017727@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307ACF558@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Ping.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Metzger, Markus T
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:42 PM
> To: Mark Kettenis
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; markus.t.metzger@gmail.com; jan.kratochvil@redhat.com; palves@redhat.com;
> tromey@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [patch v3 16/16] btrace, x86: restrict to Atom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Kettenis [mailto:mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:27 PM
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
>
> > > +int
> > > +i386_linux_supports_btrace (void)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int cpuid, model, family;
> > > +
> > > + if (!linux_supports_btrace ())
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("movl $1, %%eax;"
> > > + "cpuid;"
> > > + : "=a" (cpuid)
> > > + :: "%ebx", "%ecx", "%edx");
> > > +
>
> [...]
>
> > You can't have this function in a -tdep.c, since this file needs to be
> > compilable everywhere (not just on i386/amd64). But even in a -nat.c
> > file you shouldn't use inline assembly, since it isn't a standardized
> > C feature. I can only guess why you want to restrict this feature to
> > Atom only, but I suspect that the proper solution is to query the
> > target whether branch tracing is supported. That means the -nat.c
> > code should have code to query for support in the Linux kernel.
>
> I agree that it would be better to have this check done in the kernel. The problem is that such a patch will take very long before
> it becomes available in distributions. And even then, we would need to handle kernels without the patch, so we would need
> something
> similar to this in gdb, as well.
>
> I took the cpuid bits from gdb/go32-nat.c. I have not seen any compilation guard around it.
>
> I thought that the i386-tdep files are meant to contain i386 specific code, that's why I put the code there. Where would be the
> right place to put such code?
>
> Thanks,
> Markus.
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Peter Gleissner, Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052