This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)


On Tuesday, July 31 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I
>> noticed this failure.  The patch which introduced this failure was
>> committed because of:
>>
>>       http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659>
>> On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is:
>>
>>     info register pc fp
>>     pc: 0x400520
>>     fp: 0x7fffffffc490
>>     (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
>>
>> On ppc64/s390x, it is:
>>
>>     info register pc fp
>>     pc             0x10000658       0x10000658 <main+20>
>>     fp: 0xfffffffd120
>>     (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
>
> I'm getting this:
>
> info register pc fp
> pc             0x8000042c       0x8000042c <main+4>
> fp             0xefae83e4       0xefae83e4
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp

This should also fail using GDB 7.5.  Could you please test the
following patch?

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio

Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof
 # Regression test for
 # http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
 gdb_test "info register pc fp" \
-    "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"
+    "pc(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_pc}(( |\t)+${valueof_pc} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp(:)?( |\t)+${valueof_fp}(( |\t)+${valueof_fp})?\[\r\n\]+"


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]