This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: ARI troubles
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Pierre Muller <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Pedro Alves <alves dot ped at gmail dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:52 -0700
- Subject: Re: ARI troubles
- References: <4f972bf9.44d8b60a.1aeb.73dcSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4F97308D.2030906@gmail.com> <20120425155629.GI10958@adacore.com> <4f98223f.094ab60a.6b23.1692SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
src/gdb/contrib?
src/contrib?
gcc has lots of utility scripts in their top level contrib directory.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Pierre Muller
<pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> wrote:
> Big question:
> ?where do we put this script?
>
> Pierre
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De?: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
>> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker
>> Envoyé?: mercredi 25 avril 2012 17:56
>> À?: Pedro Alves
>> Cc?: Pierre Muller; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Objet?: Re: ARI troubles
>>
>> > > My problem here is that the same gdb_ari.sh script
>> > > is used both for trunk as well as fixes branch...
>> > >
>> > > How should I cope with such changes?
>> >
>> >
>> > The script should really be imported to the gdb tree, and
>> > then trunk and branches would have their own versions/revisions
>> > of the script.
>>
>> Agreed. Let's move the script over to the GDB sources, and then
>> we can document Pierre the official maintainer of that script.
>>
>> > The web bits of the ARI would then be adjusted to invoke the script
>> > found in the gdb sources being tested.
>>
>> That should be relatively easy to do, and we can keep two copies
>> around for a day or two while we make the transition...
>