This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: sanjoy at playingwithpointers dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:45:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.
References: <1313821635-22137-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1313821635-22137-6-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <20110820175838.GC26447@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201108201829.p7KITqt7024731@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:29:52 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Couldn't GDB just export these functions to the plugin without having to use
> > the callbacks vector?  Python does so, libthread_db does so (see
> > proc-service.list).
> 
> I'd say that's a bad idea.  The --dynamic-list linker option isn't
> uniformly available, and even -rdynamic may not work everywehere.

But neither glibc libthread_db nor Python works there.  But it is true I heard
some platforms have problems creating libraries with referenced unresolved by
any other library.

Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- JIT Reader (re-roll)
  - From: Sanjoy Das
- [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.
  - From: Sanjoy Das
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] New JIT unwinder.
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]