This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints


>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> I did yet a bit more work on:
Pedro>  <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
Pedro> This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
Pedro> mechanism.

Pedro> IMO, this is committable as is.  WDYT?

I read through them all.  I think this is a great series.  Please check
it in.

I'm not particularly fond of patch #4, but I understand why you did it,
and I agree that statically initialized vtables are a pain -- I am often
grepping for all instances and hoping I haven't missed one.  (I wish we
could require designated initializers for these so I could more easily
search for field names...)

I think we could make most of the vtable pointers (but not objects due
to the initialization approach) const.  I think that would help clarity
a bit.  I'm happy to do this after these patches go in.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]