This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.

From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:01 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
References: <20101211004734.E48242461AD@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <83ei9o209o.fsf@gnu.org> <AANLkTi=EMyuiERbXYuD=1fQf8ErxrFDGH7c_5Le9p_tz@mail.gmail.com> <E1PSkUR-0008Mm-3v@fencepost.gnu.org> <AANLkTingUcfwc8X=FPD467ZrHQ+WM+3Ov5TJY2pfbp4J@mail.gmail.com> <E1PSlK2-0002ic-Pj@fencepost.gnu.org>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> What about "gdb core" or "gdb -p PID"? ?These are the 2 use-cases I
> mentioned that involve loading the shared libraries. ?I know that "gdb
> hello" doesn't do that until you actually run the inferior.

Righto.

References:
- [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]