This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:28:10 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
References: <20101008191154.GA13058@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <AANLkTimBuC_3L77K-=HjKu9wq0SdipsRa4b4XsONcbe2@mail.gmail.com> <20101009203945.GA12979@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m3eibvi3th.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20101012210801.GA305@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m3y6a3gkg9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:39:02 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I don't have a strong feeling either way.

Checked-in the error existing version providing back(forward)traces as IMO
such case is already a problem and it should not be difficult to track it
down:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-10/msg00082.html


> This IBM1047 scenario is far-fetched.

I have to note this problem occurs for 882 (75.51%) out of the 1168 charsets
supported by glibc.


Thanks,
Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [patch] python(+solib error): save/restore error state
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] python(+solib error): save/restore error state
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] python: save/restore/fix error state
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]