This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Add support for ARMv7M devices.
On 24/06/10 17:41, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:04:43AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
It looks to me as though this code should also mostly apply to ARMv6M
as well (coretex-m0/1). However, the choice of name
'org.gnu.gdb.arm.core-v7m' seems to suggest otherwise. Is there
really a difference between the support needed for these cores? Or
would a more suitable name be appropriate?
Historical note: it's this way because the patch predated v6m. We
need to support the v7m name internally for compatibility, but we
can rename the official version if you like.
I can imagine GDB wanting to know about BASEPRI / FAULTMASK. But we
provide the privileged registers in another "feature" today, and use
this core-v7m feature with both v6-m and v7-m. So