This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:40:43 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error
References: <1268964549-30380-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20100421160141.GB19194@adacore.com> <201004211608.o3LG8rNo016697@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Wednesday 21 April 2010 12:08:54 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > It was a ping for
> > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gdb.patches/56350
> > 
> > Aha - Mark Kettenis seemed to be OK with this, since he's the one
> > who suggested it. Mark, is this patch still OK?
> 
> Hmm, can we keep the existing gdb_assert() and just add the len <= 8
> one?  With that change, this is fine with me.

fine by me.  i can also add a comment about the gcc PR if people want.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]