This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [2 of 3]
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: msnyder at vmware dot com, jakob at virtutech dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:12:40 +0200
- Subject: Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [2 of 3]
- References: <00cf01ca265a$d4110dc0$7c332940$@com> <00d501ca2a34$93e5fe30$bbb1fa90$@com> <4B27E5D3.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Vladimir Prus <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:00:46 +0300
> Cc: Jakob Engblom <email@example.com>,
> "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>,
> Eli Zaretskii <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Personally, I'd find it better if the --reverse option be described
> in one place, either as top-level section under "MI", and at the
> begining of "Execution commands" section.
It doesn't really matter either way, except for one consideration: if
someone uses the manual as a reference, and reads only about a single
command, they would be surprised to see the description of all the
options except one.
For this reason, I think it is better to do it the way Jakob wrote the
If you are still unconvinced, please tell why you prefer to have the
description of --reverse in one place. Maybe I'm missing something.