This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFA] 64-bit range types in GDB
> > Paul> + _("Suspicious DW_AT_byte_size value treated as zero
> instead of 0x%llx"),
> > Paul> + (long long) DW_UNSND (attr));
> > Are %ll and `long long' really portable? I think you need something
> > else here. There are a few cases.
You shouldn't use %ll
as this would degenerate ARI regressions.
Please use %s with plongest or pulongest functions
Otherwise, I really like the idea of your patch to
remove the 32bit limitation for ranges!
as ARI "maintainer"...