RE: [RFA] 64-bit range types in GDB

["Pierre Muller" <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>]

> > Paul> +         _("Suspicious DW_AT_byte_size value treated as zero
> instead of 0x%llx"),
> > Paul> +         (long long) DW_UNSND (attr));
> >
> > Are %ll and `long long' really portable?  I think you need something
> > else here.  There are a few cases.


  You shouldn't use %ll
as this would degenerate ARI regressions.

Please use %s with plongest or pulongest functions
from utils.c

  Otherwise, I really like the idea of your patch to
remove the 32bit limitation for ranges!

Pierre Muller
as ARI "maintainer"...