This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: FYI: use UTF-16 and UTF-32, not UCS-2 and UCS-4
- From: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>, <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:56:27 +0200
- Subject: RE: FYI: use UTF-16 and UTF-32, not UCS-2 and UCS-4
- References: <m363b6yczm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <837hvmt6tr.fsf@gnu.org>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Eli Zaretskii
> Envoyé?: Saturday, September 26, 2009 11:05 AM
> À?: tromey@redhat.com
> Cc?: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet?: Re: FYI: use UTF-16 and UTF-32, not UCS-2 and UCS-4
>
> > From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:40:29 -0600
> >
> > I am undecided as to whether I ought to push this into the 7.0
> branch.
> > Any opinions?
>
> I'd prefer that the branch commits be limited to clear bugfixs only,
> at this time.
If that feature was added since last release,
it would mean that we would use "UCS" as default in 7.0 only,
is that a good thing?
On 7.1 release, users might complain about a
new feature introduced in 7.0
and already changed in 7.1...
Thus, I would be in favor of applying this to
branch also.
Just my two cents,
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB