This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Accelerate blocks sorting


Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,

GDB has been reported as hanging on crashed webkit.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507267

Time of (using webkitgtk-debuginfo-1.1.8-1.fc11.x86_64)
	gdb -nx -ex 'info line *0x350080' ~/t/libwebkit-1.0.so.2.6.0.debug </dev/null

the patch reduces from 40.1s to 4.6s. (0x350080 is in a CU of 0x8d6ed bytes.)

Regression tested on {x86_64,i686}-fedora-linux-gnu.

Is it actually hanging? Or is it just taking a long time?


The patch looks ok at first glance, but I'm a little confused
about the problem being fixed.


2009-06-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	Accelerate blocks sorting while reading debug info.
	* buildsym.c (block_compar): New function.
	(end_symtab): Replace the bubble sort by a qsort based code.

--- gdb-6.8.50.20090302/gdb/buildsym.c-orig 2009-06-22 15:20:39.000000000 +0200
+++ gdb-6.8.50.20090302/gdb/buildsym.c 2009-06-22 17:50:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -900,6 +900,19 @@ watch_main_source_file_lossage (void)
}
}
+/* Helper function for qsort. Parametes are `struct block *' pointers,
+ function sorts them in descending order by their BLOCK_START. */
+
+static int
+block_compar (const void *ap, const void *bp)
+{
+ const struct block *a = *(const struct block **) ap;
+ const struct block *b = *(const struct block **) bp;
+
+ return (BLOCK_START (b) > BLOCK_START (a))
+ - (BLOCK_START (b) < BLOCK_START (a));
+}
+
/* Finish the symbol definitions for one main source file, close off
all the lexical contexts for that file (creating struct block's for
them), then make the struct symtab for that file and put it in the
@@ -953,32 +966,28 @@ end_symtab (CORE_ADDR end_addr, struct o
OBJF_REORDERED is true, then sort the pending blocks. */
if ((objfile->flags & OBJF_REORDERED) && pending_blocks)
{
- /* FIXME! Remove this horrid bubble sort and use merge sort!!! */
- int swapped;
- do
- {
- struct pending_block *pb, *pbnext;
+ unsigned count = 0;
+ struct pending_block *pb;
+ struct block **barray, **bp;
+ struct cleanup *back_to;
- pb = pending_blocks;
- pbnext = pb->next;
- swapped = 0;
+ for (pb = pending_blocks; pb != NULL; pb = pb->next)
+ count++;
- while (pbnext)
- {
- /* swap blocks if unordered! */
+ barray = xmalloc (sizeof (*barray) * count);
+ back_to = make_cleanup (xfree, barray);
- if (BLOCK_START (pb->block) < BLOCK_START (pbnext->block))
- {
- struct block *tmp = pb->block;
- pb->block = pbnext->block;
- pbnext->block = tmp;
- swapped = 1;
- }
- pb = pbnext;
- pbnext = pbnext->next;
- }
- }
- while (swapped);
+ bp = barray;
+ for (pb = pending_blocks; pb != NULL; pb = pb->next)
+ *bp++ = pb->block;
+
+ qsort (barray, count, sizeof (*barray), block_compar);
+
+ bp = barray;
+ for (pb = pending_blocks; pb != NULL; pb = pb->next)
+ pb->block = *bp++;
+
+ do_cleanups (back_to);
}
/* Cleanup any undefined types that have been left hanging around


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]