Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

Could someone help us about this?

Thanks,
Hui

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:41, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hui,
> I think, FCTRL, FTAG, FOP are part of i386 also.
> for e.g.
> FFREE insn, changes only tag register.
> frstor affetcs whole FPU environment.
> The FPU operating environment consists of the FPU control word, status word, tag
> word, instruction pointer, data pointer, and last opcode.
> we need them for i386 too.
> I have sent the test_float.c in my previous mail, where you will find all these registers getting changed and tested.
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
>> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 3:48 AM
>> >> diff -urN
>> gdb.orig/i386-tdep.h gdb.new/i386-tdep.h
>> >> --- gdb.orig/i386-tdep.h ? ? ? ?2009-05-17
>> 17:56:44.000000000 -0400
>> >> +++ gdb.new/i386-tdep.h 2009-05-31
>> 16:33:14.000000000 -0400
>> >> @@ -145,7 +145,22 @@
>> >> ? I386_ES_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* %es */
>> >> ? I386_FS_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* %fs */
>> >> ? I386_GS_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* %gs */
>> >> - ?I386_ST0_REGNUM ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* %st(0)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST0_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(0)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST1_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(1)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST2_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(2)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST3_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(3)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST4_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(4)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST5_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(5)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST6_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(6)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_ST7_REGNUM, ? ? ? ? ? ? /* %st(7)
>> */
>> >> + ?I386_FCTRL, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/*
>> floating point env regs : FCTRL-FOP */
>> >> + ?I386_FSTAT,
>> >> + ?I386_FTAG,
>> >> + ?I386_FISEG,
>> >> + ?I386_FIOFF,
>> >> + ?I386_FOSEG,
>> >> + ?I386_FOOFF,
>> >> + ?I386_FOP
>> >> ?};
>> >>
>> >
>> > About this part, I think this is my mistake. ?I
>> didn't take fp work
>> > for now very clear (Or I am still not clear with x86
>> fp).
>> > FCTRL, FOP and so on are the fp reg of amd64. ?For
>> now, prec is still
>> > not support amd64 (I am working on it).
>> > And amd64's support are in amd64-tedp.... files.
>> ?Change i386_regnum
>> > is not a good idea.
>> >
>> > I suggest you divide fp patch to 2 parts. One is for
>> i386, the other for amd64.
>> > For now, just send i386 patch for review. ?And send
>> amd64 patch when
>> > prec support amd64.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What do you think about my idea?
>>
>
>
>
>