Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

Hi Marc and Michael,

Sorry I forget this issue just reproduce in SLED 10.

I reproduced it with cvs-head and patch can fix it.  Michael, Please
help me review it.

The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.

2009-05-06  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>

       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
       breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
       into dynsym resolve code.

Thanks,
Hui

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 13:31, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I cannot reproduce this issue with cvs-head.
> Could you please help me test with this issue?
> If both of us cannot reproduce this issue, ?I think I can give up this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:10, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> This patch is for bug in
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00246.html.
>>
>> The reason of bug is when inferior reverse exection into dynsym
>> resolve code, gdb doesn't insert breakpoint in right address.
>> It just happen in some distributions for example SLED.
>>
>> This patch make gdb insert breakpoint in right address or step in that case.
>>
>> 2008-03-02 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
>> ? ? ? breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
>> ? ? ? into dynsym resolve code.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>

Attachment: fix-reverse-dynsym-error.txt
Description: Text document