This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org 写于 2009-03-17 23:57:43: > > > Note that Qinwei is also capable of reviewing your code. > I can take a look, but it's better if Qinwei does it, because he has > actual knowledge of the target. These code have been reviewed by Qinwei. Actually, part of the codes are written by him. > > If you haven't done so, the gdb/CONTRIBUTE file contains valuable > information. You may also want to give gdb/MAINTAINERS a quick read. > > The first thing that struck me was the fact that the patch was produced > in the wrong format, so "context" is missing. Could you resubmit your > patch using the "-u" option? For instance "cvs diff -u ...". Sorry, forget that, my mistake. > > Also, it looks like you are submitting several changes in one patch, > which we prefer not to. For instance, your change to gdb/configure.tgt > can be submitted as is, as it is independent of the target; it just > tells gdb about the the simulator. These changes are parts of a logical change, so I think submit as a whole is OK. But this time, I put change about gdb/configure.tgt on another patch. > In any case, > this is also an independent change, so this can be submitted separately > from the rest. By now, leave them alone for a moment. > > There is no score subdirectory in sim/. Are you going to submit > a simulator for that target? We have a simulator for it, so put a check for simulator in gdb/configure.tgt may make our life a bit easy. But as far as I know, these is no plan to submit this simulator, even in binary form. > > The rest of the patch is very hard to read! Could you explain a little > bit the actual changes you made? At first sight, what the patch says > is that you replaced pretty much everything, which I doubt is the case. The original S+core have been renamed S+core 7, the new variant named S+core 3. So lots of functions in score-tdep.c have been rewritten or been renamed, that's why you see almost everything have changed. Attachments are my new patches, with context information. Thank you for your time, Don
Attachment:
gdb-configure.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
gdb-score.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |