This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: make attaching to stopped processes work under windows
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: oswald dot buddenhagen at trolltech dot de, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:14:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: make attaching to stopped processes work under windows
- References: <20090226192552.GB15958@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090228004414.GA21767@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090302100651.GA8157@troll08.nokia.trolltech.de> <20090302172305.GK26056@adacore.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:23:05 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > > Suspending random threads like this is usually a bad idea. Do you
> > > actually have a use cause that requires attaching to suspended threads?
> > >
> > i should point out that the patch contains a comment answering that
> > question and that i pointed that out in the only sentence the mail
> > contained. so please be a little bit more attentive, or make it somewhat
> > clearer that you already are (by relating to previous content when you
> > ask something). thanks.
>
> Please, let's remain courteous. Chris is not your employee, he is
> a volunteer who maintains, among other things, the Windows ports of GDB.
100% agreement. Even if the said comment did answer the question
(which it doesn't, even after I re-read it several times), there's no
justification for such rudeness in response to a simple query.