This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Add la_getstr member to language_defn
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:39:37 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Add la_getstr member to language_defn
- References: <1227417278.28256.183.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081123161013.GA15069@caradoc.them.org> <1227490821.8533.25.camel@hotblack.bauerhaus> <20081124022858.GA19331@caradoc.them.org> <1227551659.28256.225.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081124202146.GA1991@caradoc.them.org> <1227564549.28256.248.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1230949603.8380.143.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090203002336.GB3964@adacore.com> <1233666130.14735.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090203170106.GI3964@adacore.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:
Joel> I think it's worth a try, but probably Tom and others might want
Joel> to comment on that. From my end, for Ada, c_get_string is a good
Joel> intermediate solution until the full solution is implemented.
Joel> For the "minimal language", I think that this routine would be
Joel> the best we could do. Not sure about m2 and Fortran, but maybe
Joel> this can equally help...
It isn't the right thing for Java, but I don't think that matters much.
I'll look at writing the correct function for Java as a follow-up.
I'm ok either with the current patch (plus changes to Ada and the
minimal language to use c_get_string) or with your suggestion.
Tom