This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Displaced stepping with wrong entry point address


> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:28:06 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> 
> 
> But I guess SPU could always install its own callback to handle those
> special cases ...  (just as we install the ON_STACK dummy call location
> method because the AT_ENTRY method doesn't work for combined applications.)

Now you mention it, it would be nice if we could change the SPU code
such that it doesn't use generic_push_dummy_code().  This function
abuses frame_align(), and it would be nice if we could eliminate it.

Something like i386_dicos_push_dummy_code() is needed.  I can roll you
a diff if you want, but I won't be able to test it.

Thanks,

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]