This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix Ericsson DICOS inferior function calls


> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:48:10 +0100
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Monday 07 July 2008 23:56:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> > I think we should get rid of generic_push_dummy_code(), and instead
> > require that each target that puts the dummy breakpoint on the stack
> > provides its own push_dummy_code() function.  Could you provide one
> > for DICOS?
> 
> Something like this?

Looks good to me.

> It looks like the only other target that uses ON_STACK and doesn't
> define a push_dummy_code is spu-tdep.c.

Let's see if I can convince the IBM guys to do something similar, and
then we can remove the somewhat bogus generic_push_dummy_code().

Thanks,

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]