This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fwd: [RFA] new command to search memory
- From: "Doug Evans" <dje at google dot com>
- To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 20:07:51 -0700
- Subject: Re: Fwd: [RFA] new command to search memory
- References: <20080214021915.F3FE51C72F0@localhost> <20080226022335.GB4456@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0802281844q23f860e7hd4ee9977fdf9b4b3@mail.gmail.com> <20080229031252.GA2897@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0804161946n687aab63u51e44b51b6118de6@mail.gmail.com> <e394668d0804280706h70e36428yd8ba07abb44e086e@mail.gmail.com> <u4p9lzuar.fsf@gnu.org>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> --- doc/gdb.texinfo 16 Apr 2008 13:14:18 -0000 1.481
>> +++ doc/gdb.texinfo 17 Apr 2008 02:35:24 -0000
>
> This part is also okay, but I have a few comments/corrections.
>
>> +@table @code
>> +@item b
>> +Bytes.
>> +@item h
>> +Halfwords (two bytes).
>> +@item w
>> +Words (four bytes).
>> +@item g
>> +Giant words (eight bytes).
>> +@end table
>
> In this table, the text under @item's are not complete sentences, so
> it's better to start them with a lowercase letter and not end them
> with a period.
Cut-n-paste-n-tweak from @section Examining memory.
I can fix that too if you like (in a separate patch of course).
I'll make the other corrections. Thanks.