This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: SIGSEGV on gdb 6.7*
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:54:47PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> That said -- I agree with Daniel. I can see where
> flushing the register cache and flushing the frame cache
> are two things that should probably always be done at
> the same time -- but I'm worried about the extra overhead
> that this patch introduces. We call registers_changed
> A LOT, and in doing so we assume that it has a very
> low overhead.
If the registers have changed, how can the frame cache still possibly
be valid?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery