This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Try2: Inform about new thread in a single place.
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: cgd at google dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:02:18 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Try2: Inform about new thread in a single place.
- References: <200712212104.37823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712212215.43869.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <ur6hfhwxq.fsf@gnu.org> <200801071833.51795.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:33:51 +0300
> Cc: cgd@google.com,
> gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> On Saturday 22 December 2007 12:59:29 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:15:43 +0300
> > > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> > >
> > > > * [eliz] thread-attach -> thread-events in the gdb.texinfo change. *
> > > > (I forgot to change one copy of my old command name)
> > > >
> > > > * [eliz] GDB -> @value(GDBN} in the gdb.texinfo change as well.
> > >
> > > I've missed those, sorry. Here's the revised patch.
> >
> > Thanks, but one instance of a literal "GDB" was still left uncaught:
> >
> > > +Show whether messages will be printed when GDB detects that threads
>
> Is the patch OK to commit, as soon as this bit is fixed?
Yes, as far as I'm concerned.