This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:16:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
References: <200709080018.25052.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <utzq5qro8.fsf@gnu.org> <200709081843.47005.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200709192227.27428.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:27:26 +0400
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Eli,
> are you happy with the explanations above?

I'm still not convinced that a gdb_assert shouldn't be added where the
``impossible'' is described in a comment, but I'm willing to let it
go.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- [4/9] associate bpstat with location
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]